Plan and Organize Your Research

Previous Up Next

Best Guide to Canadian Legal Research
Copyright © 1995-2008 Catherine P. Best
Conditions and terms of use

 

bulletIntroduction
bulletParameters
bulletInitial Analysis
bulletOrganisation of Research Material
bulletResearch Bibliography
bulletUsing a Research Checklist
bulletPreliminary Strategy
bulletReferences

 

Introduction

Each researcher will develop her own research strategy for the various situations she encounters. The strategy will vary depending on

bulletthe purpose and nature of the research project
bullethow much the researcher knows about the subject
bulletthe amount of time and money devoted to the project.

In order to develop effective research strategies, the researcher must spend time thinking about these factors before embarking on her research, and periodically revisit and revise her research plan in response to feedback from her research results. The researcher must also be familiar with the various sources: their content and coverage, their strengths and weaknesses, and their appropriate use.

The steps set out in Research Essentials will not be appropriate for every research problem. However, they will give you some guidance on how to approach your research when confronted with the multiplicity of resources available to you.

Warning!These steps are not completely linear. You may need to repeat certain steps or approach some sources again from a different perspective as your understanding of a legal issue grows. You will not need to complete all steps for each issue you research.

 

Parameters

money1.gif (1152 bytes)When you are in practice, your research strategy must be developed taking into account several parameters:

bulletthe deadline for completion of your research
bulletrestrictions on the amount of time and disbursements that can be expended
bulletthe purpose for which your research is required
bulletmore detailed and exhaustive research is required when preparing for argument at trial than when you are drafting the pleadings
bulletthe focus of your research will be different if you are preparing an opinion letter or legal memorandum rather than an argument for court
bulletthe scope of your research will be different depending on the level of court you are appearing before.

mbord01.gif (1043 bytes)In law school many of these parameters are irrelevant. You determine how much time you can spend on a research project. You have unlimited access to otherwise expensive on-line search tools. You are free to step outside the bounds of stare decisis and take a critical look at the law. This means you can conduct more extensive research than would often be the case in practice. You may focus more on the law of other jurisdictions and on secondary literature. You can extend your inquiry beyond what the law is to what it should be.

 

Initial Analysis

book_q.gif (1468 bytes)If your research problem is based on a fact pattern, consider the facts that have been given to you and start to characterize those facts within a legal framework. There are several ways to structure your initial analysis.  Maureen Fitzgerald, in Legal Problem Solving (Toronto: Butterworths, 1996), recommends the following structure at pages 7-8:

bulletParties
bulletWho are the people involved in the problem?
bulletWhat are the parties' roles or occupations?
bulletWhat are the relationships between the parties?
bulletWhat are the parties' special characteristics?
bulletEvents
bulletWhat occurred?
bulletWhen did it occur?
bulletWhere did it occur?
bulletWhat is the nature of the location where it occurred?
bulletHow did it occur?
bulletClaims
bulletWhat are the parties complaining of?
bulletWhat are the parties claiming?
bulletWhat are the injuries or harm?
bulletWhat will the defence to the claim likely be?

This initial "thinking time" is crucial to your research. If you don't consider the problem in this open-ended way at the beginning, you may miss important issues. During this process, note whether some facts or legal issues may be determinative. For example, an impecunious defendant, or the expiration of a limitation period, may make the rest of your research academic. Determinative issues should be given priority when you start your research.

key.gif (924 bytes)As you carry out this analysis, make a list of key words and subject headings to use during your research. Include important factual terms as well as legal concepts in your list of key words.

Proper identification of the issues and of key words and subject headings at this stage will expedite your research, and permit a more accurate and thorough analysis of the law. As you proceed through the steps identified below, constantly refer back to your initial characterisation of the issues. It is common for a researcher to change her definition of the issues as she progresses with the research project.

doc03.gif (1045 bytes)If your research is for a seminar paper, you will need to develop a thesis. Rather than just regurgitating information about a topic, you must identify what you want to say about the topic. The first step is to acquaint yourself with secondary and primary sources on the topic. Then, in order to develop your thesis, you must spend time thinking about your research data in a variety of creative ways. Some techniques for doing this are discussed in the section on Assess the Cases.

 

Organisation of Research Material

filcab2.gif (1045 bytes)In a simple, single issue research project, you can keep all of your material in a single folder without any problem. However, for a more complex research assignment, you should keep a separate folder for each separate issue of law. Put copies of relevant sources in the appropriate folder, together with notes indicating whether these sources have been updated. In one master folder you should keep your general research notes, including the problem assigned, your research strategy, the issues and sub-issues identified, and your notes on which sources have been reviewed or rejected and which sources must still be checked.

 

Research Bibliography

In order to conduct your research in an orderly fashion, it is necessary to keep a list of the sources you have reviewed. A complete research bibliography will contain the following information:

bullettitle, author and year (or most current release date) for texts, citation for periodical articles, page references for helpful or damaging passages
bulletheadings and classification numbers used in searching digest and encyclopaedia services, and the currency date for the topics searched
bulletdatabases searched, date of search, and search string used
bulletheadings used for searching in case reporter indices, and the volume number of the most recent paper part checked
bulletcase citations for cases reviewed, references to page numbers for helpful or damaging passages, and a record of where and when you noted up the case
bulletlist of statutory provisions reviewed, together with the date to which you checked whether the statute had been amended, and a record of where you checked for judicial consideration of statute

This information will keep you from going in circles and repeating the same steps. It will enable you to quickly prepare a bibliography. It will permit whomever is supervising your research to ascertain whether you have covered the proper sources, and will help you or someone else to quickly update your research at a later date.

 

Using a Research Checklist

chklst.gif (1017 bytes)Although a checklist does not permit a detailed record, it will help you keep track of your research, and will also remind you of sources to consult. This site includes a sample checklist. All sources listed on the checklist do not have to be checked for every research project. Conversely, the checklist is not exhaustive. Additional sources should be consulted depending on the nature of your project.

 

Preliminary Strategy

The easiest way to map out your initial strategy is to review a legal research checklist, and mark the sources you intend to consult.  If your research problem involves more than one legal issue, use a different copy of the checklist for each issue.

signpost.gif (1065 bytes)It will be difficult to map out a detailed research strategy until after you have reviewed some secondary sources dealing with your issues. Your strategy will vary depending on your general familiarity with the subject, and the nature of your research project. Although these readings set out a general methodology for research, your strategy must always be adapted to your situation. It must be focused on the appropriate resources in your subject area, taking into account the parameters listed above.

bulletFor a common law issue, you will usually start by reviewing one or more narrative secondary sources. However, your circumstances may dictate a different approach. If you are already familiar with the general area of law, and know a leading case, you can start your research by reviewing that case and noting it up.
bulletStatutory research is rather different from researching the common law. It requires that you start with consideration of the statute itself, and then look for judicial consideration of and commentary on the statute. Your first step will probably be to find and review an annotated version of the statute.
bulletSome research problems may require you to go beyond traditional legal sources and include research from other disciplines.

 

References

Best, Basic Legal Research Checklist.

Bora Laskin Law Library Guide to Legal Research.

Castel & Latchman, The Practical Guide to Canadian Legal Research, 2nd ed. (Toronto: Carswell, 1996).

Fitzgerald, Legal Problem Solving: Reasoning, Research and Writing, 3rd ed. (Toronto: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004).

MacEllven, Legal Research Handbook, 5th ed. (Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, 2003).

Queen's University Faculty of Law, Legal Research Materials, Steps in Legal Research.

University of Calgary, Law Library Research Guides, Starting Points.

Iosipescu & Whitehead, Legal Writing and Research Manual, 6th ed. (Toronto: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2004).

 

Back to Canadian Legal Research Homepage
This page was last modified  March 27, 2008
Copyright © 1995-2008 Catherine P. Best
Conditions and terms of use